Humanoid Robot Companies by Country
Bars count the companies represented in this 15-company snapshot.
- Rows
- 15
- Updated
- 2026-09-20
- Charts
- Record counts
- Primary source
- Unitree Robotics official website
Source-linked humanoid robotics data
Twenty data pages separate documented values from undisclosed fields. Each chart preserves original units, original currencies, evidence status, source URLs and update dates.
Dataset directory
Bars count the companies represented in this 15-company snapshot.
The histogram includes purchase prices only, grouped by original currency. Subscription payments and deposits remain in the table.
Five recorded purchase prices in USD are plotted against robot height in centimetres.
The table keeps all 11 load observations and their definitions. Incompatible payload claims are not combined into one ranking.
Runtime ranges are shown in minutes beside their recorded operating conditions. Missing endpoints are not plotted.
Bars show the published total for each named configuration. Regional counts remain visible in the table.
The matrix marks documented sensor presence. An unrecorded pairing is labelled unknown rather than absent.
Ten hand and gripper configurations are compared through their documented attributes, without a universal dexterity score.
Bars count records by their documented commercial status. They do not represent a sales conversion funnel.
Events are ordered by announcement date with the customer and task retained. Unknown unit counts are not estimated.
Production, capacity, deliveries and orders stay in separate labelled records. No combined industry total is calculated.
Four financing records retain their transaction type, date and amount qualifiers. Valuation is shown separately.
Bars count recorded use-case labels. They are not counts of installations or completed tasks.
Seven records describe reported outcomes and failure categories. They do not form a comparable failure-frequency chart.
Two operational reports are shown separately. Neither provides a complete split of time spent working, waiting or charging.
No cost-per-task estimate is displayed because the dataset contains no complete cost and output observations.
Fourteen records retain their original units and task scope. Hours, trajectories, robots and simulation environments are not plotted on a shared scale.
The two comparable Figure study points are kept separate from the AGIBOT factory aggregate. No fitted learning curve is displayed.
Fifteen hardware and control layers are illustrated with documented robot examples. Stage order is explanatory, not a cost share.
One manufacturer validation claim is recorded. It is insufficient to draw a survival or reliability curve.